|
The people of Arkansas are embroiled in a discussion of what’s best for
children. Two writers to the Voices page October 29 and 30, 2007, think
it is terrible that attempts are being made to prevent cohabiting
couples and homosexuals from adopting or providing foster homes to
children. They both believe that the Family Council is wrong, narrow
minded, bigoted intent on punishing people who desire to help children.
|
|
At one time this nation was guided by laws and morals, but those two
guiding forces are taking backseat the so called visionaries and their
emotional illogical reasoning who want children given over to
relationships that aren’t recognized as legal or righteous. What it
shows is their refusal to see what isn’t best for children under the
guise of doing it in the best interest of the children. In the
beginning, the proper relationship was man and woman, husband and wife,
mother and father, in the God given relationship, the foundation of the
family. Marriage has been codified into law so the marriage relationship
is both right and legal. All other so called relationships that vie for
a place of recognition are not lawful or godly. In fact, such
relationships are sin which makes them not in the best interest of the
children.
|
|
One writer argues that a valid reason for allowing homosexuals and
cohabiting couples to adopt and have foster children is because many
heterosexuals don’t keep their marriage vows. The argument is invalid.
Why you ask is that so? Those who fail to keep their marriage vows are
many times as guilty of wrong as are the cohabiting and homosexual
couples. Wrong doing on the part of married couples doesn’t make the
other relationships less wrong or acceptable.
|
|
Both letters condemn Christians for opposing the adoptions and foster
home placements. Both are short on understanding of the principles found
for families taught by the scriptures. Paul wrote in Ephesians 6:4: And,
ye fathers, provoke not your children to wrath: but bring them up in the
nurture and admonition of the Lord. The writers need to answer
a compound question. How can cohabiting couples be parents or called
mother and father; and how can homosexuals raise any child in the
nurture and instructions of the Lord when homosexual liaisons are
sinful? For that matter, cohabitation was considered sin until a few
years ago when society began to be enlightened.
|
|
Those who are trying to prevent more trouble with young people are
accused by one of the two writers of forcing their narrow-minded
religious agenda onto others. Excuse me! What they are doing is trying
to stop the insane idea that children can be made whole by raising them
in a sinful, unholy atmosphere. No matter how much they want cohabiting
and homosexual relationships to be normal. They never will be because
God has laid down the rules for proper relationships. The writers are
wrong. Expediency isn’t the best for children.
|
|
10-31-2007 DEC |
|