|
|
At long last, the Mexican born killer, Jose Medellin, who killed two
young girls, citizens of the state of Texas, has been put to death, a
very deserving end to a worthless life. That might anger a few of the no
death penalty crowd, but so be it; the execution was biblical in all
respects. When the affairs of men are put in a biblical perspective,
then the need for the execution becomes clear.
|
|
The bleeding hearts, President Bush included, demanded that Texas honor
the wishes of all of those who had no say in what Texas did to Medellin.
The World Court ordered Texas to stop the execution. Texas in effect
told everyone “take a hike” and executed Medellin on August 5, 2008. The
U.S. Supreme Court backed Texas.
|
|
Thankfully, the governor of Texas used the teaching and the principle
found in Romans 1:3-4: For rulers are not a terror to good works,
but to the evil. Wilt thou then not be afraid of the power? do that
which is good, and thou shalt have praise of the same: 4 For he is the
minister of God to thee for good. But if thou do that which is evil, be
afraid; for he beareth not the sword in vain: for he is the minister of
God, a revenger to execute wrath upon him that doeth evil.
Medellin was evil. The governor, a minister of God, executed the state’s
wrath upon the evil Medellin. Only in this case, it was a juice filled
needle, not a sword. Then on Thursday evening, August 6, 2008, another
murderer was executed.
|
|
As usual, the pansies who always feel so sorry for killers showed not
one shred of compassion for the dead or their families. The high minded
intellectual types wasted no time in trotting out the treaty argument
based on the Article VI. This
Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in
pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under
the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the
land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in
the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding. Their
argument says that treaties trump the Constitution.
|
|
What they show by their argument is the
inability to understand that constitutional supremacy is the law of the
land. Try reducing the clause to a simple sentence. This
Constitution shall be the supreme law of the land.
The words in pursuance thereof and under the authority of the
United States limit the authority of laws and treaties through the
structure of the sentence by placing laws and treaties in a subordinate
position to the Constitution’s supremacy and provisions, and which
allows them to exist. The Constitution has a provision for amendment and
treaties aren’t included.
|
|
Those who ignore God, who is the sovereign of the universe (Read Romans
13:1-7), make all sorts of statements about rights and civilized
societies, saying that the death penalty is barbaric.
Were the torture and the murder of those young girls not barbaric? In
the minds of the ungodly and even those who claim to know God, barbarism
is the practice which satisfies the supporters of executions. However,
what reason can anyone give for keeping Medellin and others like him
locked up for life at the taxpayer’s expense?
|
|
Our nation would be much better served if all
the elected officials followed the Constitution and the principles of
the Bible. By so doing, law abiding citizens would be protected from the
ravages of the predators that prey on us repeatedly. Then and only then
can we claim to honor life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. In
Sorting It Out, all who believe in the justice of Romans 13 can take
heart that at least the governor of one state did what he had to do in
spite of opposition to the contrary. All of us are safer as a result.
|
|
© 08-08-2008 DEC |
|