|
|
Liberal hypocrisy is exceeded only by their own
exaggerated opinion of themselves, their blindness of their self
determined brilliance and their forgetfulness. They don’t really believe
in God or the Bible, but love to quote it out of context. They only use
certain verses that they think suits their purposes. They have an
unhealthy narcissistic preoccupation with themselves and their feelings.
They mask their true aims and claim they care about bipartisanship. And
they are blissfully unaware of how much they display that ignorance.
|
|
A certain liberal from
Monticello wrote a letter to the editor of the ADG in January 2005, in
which he stated that there was a legitimate, debatable question as to
just when life begins. And I’ve forgotten how this came into it, but he
made a stupid remark about the ‘right’ worshiping Mammon. I wrote him a
personal letter and told him it wasn’t a legitimate question, and it was
debatable only to those who either don’t know what they are talking
about, or those who have declared for their own economic, political or
personal advantage, whose life is meaningful and whose isn‘t. It
certainly wasn’t debatable to medical scientists. For they know that the
very moment of conception marks the beginning of the life of a human.
And that some of the worlds most prominent scientists and physicians
testified to the U.S. Senate committee (1981) that life begins at
conception. That there is overwhelming agreement between physicians,
biologist, and other scientists that conception marks the beginning of
human life. And it is found in countless medical, biological, and
scientific writings and textbooks. That abortionists know as well. But
there is a lot of money to be made in murdering the unborn. And money is
the god of a lot of people. Most Democrats are for abortion. And most of
the GOP and all of the “Christian right” are against it. So who did he
say worships mammon?????
|
|
I also explained how life
begins at conception, which comes before attachment to the uterus wall
as he thought. And that at that very moment of conception, the embryo
has everything it needs or will ever have. Nothing else is ever added to
it except nutrition and fluid which it receives by osmosis between its
blood and its mothers blood, which never mixes, and may not even be the
same type (as they inherit from their father too).
|
|
I got a letter in return,
that was ignorantly and hilariously amusing. First, he told me that if I
had known anything about him, I wouldn’t have written the letter,
because he was a retired “UA. Professor.” (Oh be still my heart. I had
written to an omniscient ‘Professor’ who knew everything there was to
know.) Forgive me Lord, but I saw red at his arrogance. I answered his
letter, telling him he didn’t know anything about me either, for I was a
U.T. educated RN and teacher, who had taught Anatomy and Physiology to
nursing students for years. That most of my students were black, and
didn’t have a bit of trouble understanding it. That I had no idea what
he had taught, and maybe I wouldn’t know anything about his subject, for
I didn’t claim to know everything there was to know. But he got into my
field that I did know, and unlike him, I always put my brain in gear
before I put my mouth in motion, and didn’t write about things I didn’t
know anything about. (The really scary part, turns out, he supposedly
taught economics as well as liberalism).
|
|
In his exaggerated opinion
of himself, he wrote back, as a statement of fact, that all abortion
doctors were Republican. (I asked him if he was psychic, or had he
interviewed them all.) He claimed to be a Christian and said abortion
was a religious matter, and we shouldn’t push our beliefs onto others.
Really? What was he doing if not pushing his belief onto others?
Abortion is murdering babies, and even if it is legal, its still
murder. And if it is just a religious matter, Christians should not be
concerned with it? I asked him if someone had a gun and decided that it
was all right to kill anyone that got in his way of stealing what he
wanted, would he say it was just a religious matter, and we shouldn’t
push our beliefs on him? This man is too arrogant and ignorant for me to
take anything he says as a fact.
|
|
Then he asks that if a
chicken “has access to a rooster” is a baby chick started, and if so
what happens if that egg is fried. Is the baby chick cooked. I had him
there also. He has obviously never been on a farm. But I was raised on
one, and I did learn the lesson of fertilization there. I told him, yes
if the egg was cooked, so was the baby chick. And if he had been raised
on a farm with a few chickens with a rooster, as I had been, he would
have eaten a lot of them. But I couldn’t find in the Bible that it was a
sin to eat a baby chicken embryo.
|
|
In his next stupid answer,
he asked about all those “little fertilized eggs that didn’t’ attach,
and if they didn’t attach and hold for 30 seconds, or a minute or two,
was it still conception. And how many people would need to be hired to
save those little fertilized eggs that are flushed down the drain. And
why was a persons age not counted as from conception. I answered him
that I was concerned only with the murder of these babies, not a
spontaneous “act of God’. And who knew the exact time of conception. And
that a birthday was counted from their “birth day”. Is there no end to
his ignorance? I’m sure by now he is trying to cover his stupid
statement and trying to be funny. I told him if he was trying to be a
comedian, he failed at that too. He needed to hire a real comedian to
write his statements for him.
|
|
He wanted to know “what if
the sperm “PUNCTURES” the egg and it FLOATS DOWN THROUGH HER BODY and
over to the uterus wall and doesn’t attach, does it have a soul? I’m
sure now I’m communicating with the most ignorant of the ignorant, one
who thinks he is making a fool of me while he is displaying his
ignorance to the nth degree. For the sperm doesn’t ‘puncture” it
penetrates, and if it “floats DOWN through her body, she will be
carrying that baby in her leg.
|
|
He then said that some see
stem cell research as tinkering with the beginning and end of life
because they consider it as only “God’s business.” I asked him whose
business he considered it to be. This man is so totally arrogant and
ignorant that I scarcely pay any attention to what he writes anymore. He
always starts his letter, “ Mercy me, sakes alive, and carrot coffee“.
What for Gods sake is carrot coffee? He apparently think its cute. My
email friends and I start emailing. The ignorant ’Professor” is on
everyone’s dumb list. Everyone but him knows how ignorant he is. Its
hard for me to believe the U. of A Would hire such an ignorant person to
teach there.
|
|
He wrote one of his
ignorant epistles’ in November that a man from NLR answered.
|
|
This man from NLR has more
intelligence in his little finger than the idiot ’professor” has in his
whole body. So the ‘Professor” wrote an even more ignorant one in
December in which he asserts that that “the more educated of us,” are
most likely to be Democrats, and the most richer of us are more likely
to be Republicans‘”. Talk about hilarious. Does this fool never read
over what he has written. If he did, he surly couldn’t help but see what
an contradictory statement that was. How did the “rich Republicans get
so much richer than “the more educated of us?” If he was teaching
‘economics to these students, he was a total failure. For Democrats know
absolutely nothing about economics. Another letter writer from Pea Ridge
answered that one. He chuckled over this stupid lie, and quoted Mark
Twain, who said “ Get your facts first and then you can distort them
much as you please”. What a great letter.
|
|
©12-26-2010 JS
|
|