In Kindergarten, kids are taught that a frog turning into a prince is a fairy tale. In college, they are taught that a frog turning into a prince is science. Most teachers just regurgitate to the students what they have been taught. Both teachers and students are indoctrinated to believe evolution is fact, when in reality it is a belief system based on ever-changing concepts. Stephen Gould and others have shown that Darwin’s purpose was to destroy the idea of a divine designer. So Evolutionists always start with a bias toward naturalism.

Evolutionists insist that that “modern” science (their definition of modern science is Darwinism) is in conflict with the Christian faith. Comparing the alternative mechanisms of the beginning of life, both, or either, require faith. Because both define a religious viewpoint, one is chance, and the other is design. They think modern science shows that miracles, of which the Bible is filled, could not and did not happen. Thomas Huxley, English atheist biologist said, “The Doctrine of evolution, if consistently accepted, makes it impossible to believe the Bible.” However, it was the Christian worldview that provided the right environment for modern science in the first place. Evolutionists (atheists) believe that at first there was nothing, which exploded creating the universe. Then it rained (from nowhere) for millions of years, finally melting the rocks that came from nothing, which this ameba crawled out of, and began the process of evolution, with all the different species, and all the intelligent life on earth.. Wouldn’t that be an incredible miracle if it had happened that way? Since they believe we are just an accident, how can they say it would not be a miracle?

They regard miracles as a violation of the laws of nature, and they believe that the reason people believed in miracles in the past was because they didn’t know the laws of nature. In Jesus’ day, everyone knew that it was not natural for a virgin to have a baby, or for the dead to arise. If they hadn't known the laws of nature, they wouldn’t have recognized a miracle. The real issue is “Is there a God?” If so, then He created the laws of nature. If He created the laws, then he is at liberty to interfere with those laws. Natural laws describe God’s activity, but do not control it. If no God, then miracles become a problem, even for evolution. It is easier to believe that God created something out of nothing, than to believe that nothing created something out of nothing. The theory of evolution is still just a theory. Unfortunately, God is not discoverable by purely scientific means, which proves nothing. (Nicky Gumbel -Searching issues)

Another of the “wisest of the wise (in his own eyes, anyway), recently in a LTE, quoted the late atheist, George Carlton, who said “the invisible Santa in the sky” and “judgment day” exists only between the ears of those who choose to or are coerced into believing such fallacies.” And “religion is the greatest BS story ever told,” which the all-wise atheist writer agreed with. So there we have it straight from the horse’s mouth. (Or more likely, the other end of the horse). From one atheist to another, that makes it true folks. I agree with the part about ‘Santa in the sky.’ I learned quite a few years ago who Santa was. And I can go along with the non-Christian religion part. That completes the intelligence of both Carlton and our writer. The religion of atheism is spreading like a deadly fungus. They are completely in the dark about any philosophy being inherently religious, including atheism. They deny that atheism (Secular Humanism) is a religion. Yet, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Torcase v. Watkins in 1961, that Secular Humanism is a religion among non-theistic religions in North America.

© 07-07-2008 JS

         Next Article Satan’s Useful Idiots Part IV