ARKANSAS GUEST WRITER  Index

 

 

 

Home

 BIBLE LESSON INDEX

POEMS BY JOHANNA

SORTING IT OUT

 
 
 
ANSWERING VOICES
 
 

 

SATAN’S USEFUL IDIOTS Part IV 

 

If the evolutionists (atheists) are so convinced evolution is true, why are they worried? It’s because the evidence isn’t there. They don’t want to talk about evidence for and against Darwin’s theory. They want to talk about intelligent design, as if Bible studies were going to be a requirement in schools. They want to pretend we’re doing that, so they can distort its meaning and claim it’s religious. We are only asking that students learn the scientific evidence for and against the theory. For example, the highly sophisticated sonar systems found in both the bat and the porpoise give lie to evolution. To believe that such precise structures have evolved independently from widely different ancestral organisms, each time starting from a completely dissimilar structural beginning, is sheer fairy tale. Students can then see that evolution is flawed and bogus. That scares evolutionists.

Evolution is not only the pseudo-scientific rationale of racism, such as Planned Parenthood, communism, fascism, imperialism, Nazism, Marxism, the Eugenics movement, and other deadly socio- economic systems, it’s also the reason for the conglomeration of New Age cults and practices that are growing like weeds today. These are based squarely on evolution. It gives the greatest support to atheism, humanism and pantheism. A Kansas State professor published a letter in the journal Nature, stating, “even if all the data point to an intelligent designer, such a hypothesis is excluded from science because it isn’t naturalistic. It doesn’t matter if there’s no evidence for Darwinism, and that all evidence points to a designer, we still are not allowed to consider it science.” Notice he doesn’t say creationism has been proven false, just ruled out by definition.

All complexity, diversity, beauty, order and perfection of life-forms thoroughly defy evolutionary explanation. Only design can explain it. The complexity of the DNA molecule alone can only be explained in terms of special creation. The overwhelming witness of biology is in support of biblical creationism and soundly against evolution. They cannot prove evolution is true. Yet the evolutionist expects creationist to “prove” evolution false. They are using our tax dollars to teach their religion in our schools. They should “prove” that evolution is true. How can a theory “prove” facts? If they used their own money to teach it, they could tell anyone that wanted to hear this great lie.  But I highly resent them using mine to indoctrinate kids.

A survey was sent (1998) to 517 members of the National Academy of Science. Just over half responded. Of these, 72% said they were atheists, 21% were agnostic. (That's 93% who do not respect God. They hold to a secular humanities worldview that they want impressionable schoolchildren to embrace).

Lewis Wolpert said, writing in The Times in London “Scientists or anyone else, without religion, have to face a world in which there is no real purpose, no meaning to torment and joy, and accept that when we are dead we vanish, that there is no afterlife.” After a short life, you die and just become fodder for maggots and bacteria. All that “superior intelligence” is gone forever. You are then just an extinct ape. Science cannot deal with the loneliness or broken hearts full of grief from the loss of a loved one or sin and forgiveness. Yet atheists know they are right, not because they can prove it, or can see it in the fossils, but because it is embedded in their philosophy.

They even use theological arguments to oppose Intelligent Design, such as claiming the eye is riddled with quirks, (blind Spot), implying no competent ID would have planned that. That’s theological criticism masquerading as scientific know how. The fossil record itself discloses no history of trial and error. The eye works perfectly well as they are. Engineers tinkering with the camera haven’t been able to produce anything remotely comparable or compact. Blind chance cannot produce a seeing eye, not once, or several times in squid, vertebrates and arthropods.

© 07-07-2008 JS