|
|
Evolution is the greatest hoax in human history. Darwin gave science
what it needed to push God out of our life. It is full of holes, and
isn’t scientific. Nor is it a reliable way of explaining how life began
or how new species appear. Its just an atheistic philosophy with no
basis in fact.
|
|
Oxford biologist, Richard Dawkins, has been called Darwin's “Rottweiler”
because of his fierce attacks on belief in God. He is more an
evolutionary evangelist than a dispassionate scientist. He desperately
wants to raise the awareness and respectability of atheists. He focuses
his attack on all those who have faith, and calls belief in God a mere
delusion. He puts the Taliban, suicide bombers, terrorists and
born-again Christians in the same camp.
|
|
He has many blind fools listening to him and mimicking his foolish
words, even though his scientific discourse lacks the detailed
scientific data to support his position. Their first premise is that
believers in God are not rational, even though most of all major
scientific disciplines, including math, came from the minds of these so
called “irrational minds.” Atheists simply replaced God as all knowing
with themselves as all knowing. But anyone who thinks they are
all-knowing is a fool.
|
|
As with other atheistic writers, who arrogantly presume themselves the
authority on everything, they all committed the common error of
mistaking the empirical method for all knowledge. And they believe they
are marching toward perfection. Yet, they would be without a job if
people did not believe in God. As British philosopher G.K. Chesterton
said, “It is absurd for the evolutionist to complain that it is
unthinkable for an admittedly unthinkable God to make everything out of
nothing, and then pretend that it is more thinkable that nothing should
turn itself into everything.” Their anti-religious arguments are
irrational, unscientific and based in blind faith and wishful thinking.
|
|
If a loving, almighty God made man, then human life is sacred. But the
idea that mankind emerged by accident out of the primeval slime, leads
to a view of human life that makes mass murder possible. If we are
simply the product of time and chance, then there is no morality and no
intrinsic worth to human life. That idea liberates man to do as he
wishes, and to whom he wishes. The two most notorious and blood-soaked
political movements of the 20th Century, Nazism and Communism, both were
animated by the idea of evolution. (So was Margaret Sanger’s Planned
Parenthood.) They all rejected God.
|
|
Darwin's theory carried to its logical conclusion led to many million
deaths. And still is by abortion. Hitler was determined to eliminate the
so-called inferior races and create a Super race. He believed the
stronger must dominate and he made it illegal for Jews to marry other
Germans. He was trying to speed up evolution, to help it along, because
he believed the Aryan race was superior to other races (including Jews,
Gypsies, Slavs, Blacks, etc). (Tom DeRosa,
Evolutions Fatal Fruit) Margaret Sanger agreed with him. She
figured to put her so-called clinics in these "inferior" neighborhoods,
and by abortion and sterilization, she would eventually eliminate them.
|
|
One of Satan’s useful idiots, a Little Rock atheist, is a prime example
of this thinking. In the first letter, he criticized Kane Webb, saying
that he has allowed slanted, prejudiced, religious
viewpoints to taint his list of the worst books of 2008. He also says Hitchin’s book God is not great is brilliantly written and
the most profound and compelling books he has read. (A lot of fictional
books are brilliantly written, but that does not make them non-fiction).
He also said that to ask Paul Greenberg to critique Hitchin’s book is
like asking Hugo Chavez to critique a book written by Geo. Bush. I’m
sure in his own eyes that was an amusing line. But I missed out on the
so called humor, as I wasn’t aware Geo. Bush had written any books. (But
neither does he.) He thinks any excuse to try to make atheists appear
all knowing, and to assault God is useful. Apparently, the atheist
doesn’t think he is prejudiced, or that he used slanted or even
religious viewpoints, (they ignore the fact that atheism is a godless
religion). They so badly want everyone to be converted to atheism they
think they are smart enough to do it. It’s always amusing to listen to
them as they unknowingly describe themselves.
|
|
© 08-14-2008 JS
|
|
Next Article Satan’s Useful Idiots Part VIII |
|