Since many people have more than many others, they, without any excuses, should be compelled to spread their wealth around. That is according to Barack Hussein Obama’s message to Joe the Plumber. In Obama’s world, wealth isn’t individually owned, it is collectively owned and anyone who tries to keep it will be forced though government plans to share it with those who didn’t help earn it. Such is the socialist/communist ideology of the charlatan BHO. (You can leave out the H if you choose.)

Let’s dissect Obama’s words and give them some meaning attributable to the socialist mind’s ideology.  First, It's not that I want to punish your success.  Yes he does. In the socialist/communist mind, success means that someone else is deprived by the one being successful. Second, I just want to make sure that everybody who is behind you, that they've got a chance for success too. The sentence proves the first conclusion that one’s success deprives others of success. But weren’t those who are successful behind someone else when they began their economic journey to independence?  Third, My attitude is that if the economy's good for folks from the bottom up, it's gonna be good for everybody. Indeed, when the economy gives people at the bottom of the scale the opportunity to advance, it is good for everybody, but that advancement can not be at the forced expense of others who worked their way up. Obama wants to force the successful to give to the less successful. Does that not destroy the incentive to advance on one’s own abilities and merit?

Now for the fourth and last look at what he doesn’t mean. He said, “I think when you spread the wealth around, it's good for everybody.”  He doesn’t mean that free enterprise should spread the wealth. He intends to take from the haves and give to the have “nots” (LBJ-Democrat) or from each according to his ability to each according to his need. (Karl Marx-Communist) It is true that when wealth is spread around it will benefit everyone, but that is done by people holding jobs that allow them to earn their way in life: not though enforced redistribution by the government as Obama says should be done.

Since 1933, the nation has been subjected to the FDR brand of socialism through the New Deal, the Fair Deal and several other deals that have increased dependence on government. The latest deal is the housing fiasco that has been caused by the government demanding (with threat of force) that people, who had no money or means for paying a mortgage, must be allowed to own a house. The world’s economy is about shipwrecked due to Barack Hussein Obama, Barney Frank, Christopher Dodd, Maxine Waters, Franklin Raines and Bill Johnson, to name a few,  plundering Fannie Mae and Freddie Mack for personal gain. Apparently, Waters didn’t receive anything, but she did defend the two scoundrels at the head of those agencies.

But you must remember, all they were doing was ensuring that the wealth was being spread around, and whose wealth is it that was spread like natural fertilizer on a farm field? The wealth belonged to the people who have bank deposits, stock and bond investments and retirement accounts of all kinds. That spreading hasn’t been good for anybody except the aforementioned players in the scam which has caused losses of great magnitude by those who earn their way in life through honest endeavor without depending on the government to aid them.

Government can’t make anyone successful, but it can get out of the way so ability, work and good decisions will lead to success for those willing to step out and put their hand to the plow each day. In Sorting It Out, Obama needs to get an honest job and let us spread the wealth through work and sound investments that have made this nation the greatest on earth. We don’t need his false help.

© 10-18-2008 DEC

                            http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=78330