All science concerning the origin of the universe is conjecture. The idea that evolution can account for the origin of all living species has never been an established fact. Real facts cannot be disputed, but scientific proof is based on showing that something is a fact by repeating the event in a controlled environment where observations can be made, data drawn, and hypothesis empirically verified. The scientific method can be used only to prove repeatable things. Instead of testing their theory against the evidence, as they are supposed to do, some Darwinists consistently ignore, explain away, or misrepresent the biological facts in order to promote their theory. It’s religion masquerading as science. Evolution is even more religious than Creationism. More religions are based on evolution than creationism.

Harvard biologist, Richard Lewontin, thinking he was addressing a bunch of elites that were committed to materialism, in an article in the New York Review of Books a few years ago, admitted that science makes extravagant claims, but then admitted “we must still prefer science to any form of supernaturalism, because we have a prior commitment to materialism which must be absolute, for we cannot allow a divine foot in the door.”

God and Christianity inhibit atheist’s lifestyle. They have been intellectuality dishonest by trying to take credit for development of science, when they actually had nothing to do with it. And they insistently call Darwinism, “science.” In 1998, Creation Studies Institute sent a survey to 517 members of the National Academy of Science. Just over one-half responded. Seventy-two percent said they were atheists and twenty-one percent were agnostic. That makes ninety-three percent of NAS members who disrespect God. They hold to a secular humanist worldview that they want impressionable schoolchildren to embrace.

Primarily, creationists are the founders of almost every single one of the dozens of branches of science. Such as Antiseptic surgery (Joseph Lister), Bacteriology (Louis Pasteur), Calculus (Isaac Newton), Chemistry (Robt Boyle), Genetics (Gregor Mendel), Paleontology (John Woodward), Thermodynamics (Lord Kelvin), etc. For evolutionist to claim that creationists are not true scientists is absurd. Warner von Braun, space scientist, past director of NASA said, “It is difficult to understand a scientist who does not acknowledge the presence of God...as it is to comprehend a theologian who would deny the advance in Science.” These scientists did not see any conflict with their religion. In fact, they thought it was dependent on it.

Richard Dawkins, an atheistic Oxford biologist, said Darwin made it possible to be an “intellectually fulfilled atheist“, then added, “It is absolutely safe to say that if you meet somebody who claims not to believe in evolution, that person is ignorant, stupid, or insane or wicked.” According to Dawkins, if we don’t believe in Darwinism then we should be admitted to the loony bin, or locked up in prison.

A British Paleontologist, Colin Patterson, at a gathering of American evolutionists in the 80’s, asked, “Can anyone tell me anything you know about evolution, any one thing that is true?” His question was met with complete silence. After a few minutes of silence, a lone voice spoke up and said, “I know it shouldn’t be taught in schools.”

Darwin's theory of evolution is the creation myth. It’s merely a concept without any scientific proof. And it has been discredited. But atheists still persist in making up stories. After a Century and a half of determined looking, they have never found a fossil, or one piece of evolutionary evidence, nor have they been able to duplicate any of their so-called “evolutionary science” in the lab. It has never been proved nor observed. Yet the atheist writer said," no amount of common sense can possibly validate the authenticity of a creator of the universe.” He calls his religion “common sense?” God calls this, being “willingly ignorant.” That means, “dumb on purpose.”

The same should be said about evolution. We are constantly told that evolution is an established fact, but we are never told who established it, or by what means. Does it make any sense that every form of life on the earth came from a dumb dead rock? New technology has made a mockery of evolution. It provides far more evidence of creation than ever before. Darwinists believe anything not having a natural explanation is impossible. Therefore, Creation is excluded “by definition.” They will not acknowledge God, nor give him one bit of credit. But there is plenty of evidence for God. If only they weren’t so blind.

© 04-15-2008 JS

             Next Article The Fools of Evolution IV