Certain events at times bring the rotten apples to the top for all to see. The latest rotten apple is that of Wesley Clark, a retired military commander, who is showing his true colors as a liberal know nothing. It is one thing to be a commander who should be respected for serving his nation, but once that service is finished it is less than honest to use that service as a means to avoid consequences of demeaning political behavior. Wesley Clark, John Murtha, and John Kerry have traded on their military service to escape being held accountable for their anti-American speech.

 Murtha and Kerry both made accusations against specific honorable men of the military for their own personal gain. Both are now public servants who are charged with doing those things that will protect the nation. Their conduct might be considered treasonous in that such remarks give aid and comfort to the enemy. (In fact, many Democrats in Congress might be in the same boat with them.)

The issue in this article though is former general Wesley Clark. He jumped on the trash Rush bandwagon and in the process he lowered himself more deeply into the slime of politically generated smear. He said that Rush Limbaugh labeled any American soldier who supports an end to the war in Iraq as "phony," …. That Mr. Clark is an out and out lie and those who lie are liars. http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/Wesley_Clark_Limbaugh/2007/10/03/37680.html

You complained that of the over 10,000 e-mails challenging Rush to appear on a show to answer for his “misdeeds,” he has failed to respond to the request. (Do you really think he should waste his time responding to people that are no smarter than you?) Mr. Clark you told another lie. Rush has responded to the request by answering on his show every one of the false charges and then some. While your service to the nation may have been commendable, there is evidence that it wasn’t as commendable as your supporters might portray, and this latest episode of falling in line with other liars serves to undermine you further with your lies about Rush Limbaugh.

When you ran for President you proved to be a light weight of immense proportions by not knowing the issues. It has been an observation over the years that those of light weight mental abilities tend to be liberals and you certainly have done nothing to eliminate that opinion. It always seemed strange that would aligned with the liberal Democrats, but now with tirade against Rush it has become much more clear. It indicates you are a follower possessing no leadership ability.

That brings me now to the title of this article. You wanted to be president but failed to muster the needed support from your own liberal kind. You tried to make a big splash in Arkansas during your campaign and found that the pond was empty. The truth is the ponds were empty everywhere you tried to make a splash. It looks like you are still wallowing in the mud from all those attempted splashes. Now you cover yourself with more mud by denouncing Rush and are following your liberal ilk’s inanities all the while you apparently think that you are leading.

It is a shame of immense proportions when a man portrays himself as a soldier when in fact he never has been a soldier. Jesse Macbeth never was a soldier and thus the term phony soldier for him and all of those who have made false claims about themselves and the military. They were phony soldiers. It is an even greater shame when men who have been soldiers twist the truth and lie to gain favor with political ilk.

Now we’ll get to the last point concerning phony soldiers. You and your leaders have chosen to take off the gloves and fight dirty. So be it, so here it comes. Those who have lied and continue to lie are phony patriots. Those who support them are phony patriots and those who repeat the lies are in the same category. That brings me back to you Mr. Clark, a man who is unfit to lead and the proof is your comments concerning Rush. Liars can’t lead. In Sorting It Out, the phony soldier list needs to be expanded by one name. Can you guess whose name should be added to the list?

© 10-03-2007