There is a saying that the more things change the more they stay the same. Although this article was written in 2008, just change the name from Hillary to the nut job, (aka Barack Hussein Obama) and the pronouns from feminine to masculine.   

When religion, God, Jesus, and morals are mentioned, the typical liberal screams the separation of church and state is being violated. Not that such a dictum exists is beside the point with them, they want nothing to do with religion, that is God’s religion, commonly known as Christianity. And for good reason they protest; they have their own religion but won’t admit it and in the process, they violate the separation of church and state mantra, which they are so fond of bellowing at others. Their god is socialism and all that goes with it. They aren’t above mixing state and religion because the state is the foundation for their religion of government control for all things.

Hillary Clinton says her religion means a lot to her, whatever that means, unless it is understood that she is speaking of socialism. The type of religion that makes up her belief system is far different from that of God’s system of belief. Her belief is big government and the use of force to make people do as she wishes. Those who doubt the foregoing need to read what she has said and proposes doing based on the belief system (religion) that means so much to her.

In an article, CNSNEWS 2-04-2008, she described universal health care as "a core Democratic value and a moral principle, and I'm absolutely going to do everything I can to achieve that." A core value of the Democrats is the government taking care of all, which has become a moral imperative. Her statement that she will do everything to achieve should be taken as a warning that she will use the power of her god, the federal government, to bring national health care into existence, whether you need insurance or want it. She said, "[T] there are a number of ways" of getting people to enroll in her universal health care plan including going after people's wages, automatic enrollment. I think you can automatically enroll people, and you will then say you've got to be part of this." Can you spell tyranny?

For far too long, increasing numbers of people have been led to worship at the altar of the Democrat party, the all-powerful federal behemoth of government control. Instead of relying on work and the help of God, they grovel at the feet of people like Hillary Clinton, expecting that she and her minions will provide for them by forcing others to pay the cost of their existence. Instead of contributing to the nation, they dip into the basket to extract the wealth of others so they can continue their existence. Existence is the right word when one considers that being dependent on the government for ones livelihood isn’t living in liberty, but mere existence under the heavy tyrannical hand of the Hillary’s type of government.

She expressed one further part of her chilling agenda. [T] the "key point" is to implement universal health care. She said the mechanism by which it is achieved -- "going after people's wages, automatic enrollment...whatever the mechanism is, is not as important as...the fundamental commitment to universal health care..." She will shove freedom and liberty aside so that the government can institute her agenda, which is more important to her. Tyranny anyone?

 The woman is on record for saying that she won’t force onto any one what they can’t afford. The reverse is that the government will determine what you can afford and make you buy the insurance under threat of penalty. She also said that wage garnishment was an option if people resisted buying the insurance willingly. In the private world, such actions are called extortion and robbery. But in the socialist world, it is called forcing you to do what we know is best for you and that is acceptable and right.   

It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to see that there are two sets of values and morals operating in this nation. One is the value and moral system of God on which this nation was conceived and built. The other is that of Hillary Clinton and the Democrat party which has substituted their own dubious values and morals or lack thereof for the standards on which the nation thrived for many years.

It should be evident that God’s way offers freedom and liberty, while the government offers nothing but tyranny, and in the end a dictatorship, wherein all behavior will be subject to the approval or non-approval. Is that what the people who follow her really want?  In the same regard, is it what the people who worship at the feet of the nut job really want?

A choice must be made about the values and morals. Which ones will it be; the ones espoused by Hillary and the Democrats or those on which this nation was founded? With Food For Thought, all who value real freedom and liberty will choose those from God. There is no in between.

© 02-04-2008 DEC